Recent Blog Posts

In the last few months, I have installed and upgraded my second preferred GNU/Linux system, GNU Guix, on multiple boxes. Regarding that system, I have already written a few introductory posts in the recent past. This is an update about my experiences as a user and developer. I still think Guix is a giant step forward in packaging and management, in comparison with Debian and other distributions, for elegance and inner coherence.

I recently re-read the seminal book by Fred Brooks about software engineering, entitled "The Mythical Man-Month" or MM-M for brevity. Specifically, I read the paper version of the 20th anniversary, which was revised and reprinted in 1995, after the first edition of 1975. I did that on purpose, firstly because it is always a fantastic read, and secondly to understand how much of its contents is still valid today, exactly thirty years later since its last revision.

I recently read some interesting articles (see [1,2]) by Bert Hubert about IaaS and SaaS in the EU, which are generally considered cloud computing at large. He has quite a deep understanding of such topics, and the reading is enjoyable and triggered a few reflections.

I'm writing this post to react to one of the many articles and threads about the presumed death of this or that programming language, library, framework, or tool. What that article was about and who wrote it is secondary. I could synthesize my idea by citing a well-known joke by Mark Twain: "The rumors about my death are greatly exaggerated."

Following a post detailing my email setup across multiple personal boxes, I'll summarize an outline of my approach for managing data across multiple workstations and individual profiles in this post. This system (or collection of tools and workflow) has evolved over time and continues to adapt to various needs and scenarios, offering high flexibility and control for my use cases.

My last post dealt with some ideas about copyright that need more in-depth analysis. First, as it was common in the old good days, IANAL applies to this post and the whole topic. The final results of current litigations in courts that touch on some of the primary companies involved in the whole AI thing could ultimately differ from what is now the common sense point of view (mine). This post could become rapidly obsolete, so another disclaimer is due for this aspect, too.

My last post captured the attention of my old fellow Sandro 'strk' Santilli on Mastodon, who sent a provocation about the whole AIAD thing. So, the challenge is accepted.

Like many other developers, I recently started using some LLM-based AI systems as helpers for coding in a few languages. I'm not a fan of VSCode, and I prefer a more traditional approach to coding: I hate to cope with code completion servers and use one of my preferred editors, Vim or Emacs. Navigating by tags is more than enough for me. That said, this is the summary of my current experience in the new world of AI-aided approach to coding (i.e., AI-aided development or AIAD for brevity).

I recently read with interest the post where Hector Martin resigned as Asahi Linux leader. As possibly well-known, Asahi Linux is the very first Fedora-based distribution where all the hard work to support the Apple ARM M* chip series in the Linux world found its way.

Some time ago, I eventually listened on YouTube to a year-old interview by Guido Penta with Salvatore Sanfilippo (aka Antirez) about the art of development in the current age. I agree with some points, specifically that in many cases, multiple developers work for their whole work life on boring/marginal activities. One of them, IMHO, is the entire front-end effort in developing web-based applications, a development task that nowadays could be broadly and proficiently managed mainly via AI to reduce human intervention to minimal parts and architectures.